Crj 331 week 8 case study 3: michael brown

Case Study 3: Michael Brown

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Crj 331 week 8 case study 3: michael brown
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Criteria

 

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Determine whether or not after the resolution of this event, the officer in question will need an additional psychological assessment to ensure that his future conduct, if he returns to active duty, is befitting of an officer. Provide a rationale for your response.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not after the resolution of this event, the officer in question will need an additional psychological assessment to ensure that his future conduct, if he returns to active duty, is befitting of an officer. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Insufficiently determined whether or not after the resolution of this event, the officer in question will need an additional psychological assessment to ensure that his future conduct, if he returns to active duty, is befitting of an officer. Insufficiently provided a rationale for your response.

Partially determined whether or not after the resolution of this event, the officer in question will need an additional psychological assessment to ensure that his future conduct, if he returns to active duty, is befitting of an officer. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Satisfactorily determined whether or not after the resolution of this event, the officer in question will need an additional psychological assessment to ensure that his future conduct, if he returns to active duty, is befitting of an officer. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Thoroughly determined whether or not after the resolution of this event, the officer in question will need an additional psychological assessment to ensure that his future conduct, if he returns to active duty, is befitting of an officer. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response. 

2. Explain the fundamental distinction between deductive analytic techniques and inductive analytic techniques. Analyze if the officer in question made his decision to act based on deductive analytic techniques or inductive analytic techniques. Provide a rationale for your response.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely explained the fundamental distinction between deductive analytic techniques and inductive analytic techniques. Did not submit or incompletely analyzed if the officer in question made his decision to act based on deductive analytic techniques or inductive analytic techniques. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

 

Insufficiently explained the fundamental distinction between deductive analytic techniques and inductive analytic techniques. Insufficiently analyzed if the officer in question made his decision to act based on deductive analytic techniques or inductive analytic techniques. Insufficiently provided a rationale for your response.

 

Partially explained the fundamental distinction between deductive analytic techniques and inductive analytic techniques. Partially analyzed if the officer in question made his decision to act based on deductive analytic techniques or inductive analytic techniques. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

 

Satisfactorily explained the fundamental distinction between deductive analytic techniques and inductive analytic techniques. Satisfactorily analyzed if the officer in question made his decision to act based on deductive analytic techniques or inductive analytic techniques. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

 

 

Thoroughly explained the fundamental distinction between deductive analytic techniques and inductive analytic techniques. Thoroughly analyzed if the officer in question made his decision to act based on deductive analytic techniques or inductive analytic techniques. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

3. Argue for or against the theory that a well prepared officer should possess the following characteristics – agreeableness, empathy, listening comprehension, and sociability – in order to perform well as a law enforcement officer. Next, determine if any of these characteristics were present when Officer Wilson encountered Michael Brown. Provide a rationale to support your response.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely argued for or against the theory that a well prepared officer should possess the following characteristics – agreeableness, empathy, listening comprehension, and sociability – in order to perform well as a law enforcement officer. Did not submit or incompletely determined if any of these characteristics were present when Officer Wilson encountered Michael Brown.

Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support your response.

Insufficiently argued for or against the theory that a well prepared officer should possess the following characteristics – agreeableness, empathy, listening comprehension, and sociability – in order to perform well as a law enforcement officer. Insufficiently determined if any of these characteristics were present when Officer Wilson encountered Michael Brown.

 

Insufficiently provided a rationale to support your response.

 

Partially argued for or against the theory that a well prepared officer should possess the following characteristics – agreeableness, empathy, listening comprehension, and sociability – in order to perform well as a law enforcement officer. Partially determined if any of these characteristics were present when Officer Wilson encountered Michael Brown.

Partially provided a rationale to support your response.

 

Satisfactorily argued for or against the theory that a well prepared officer should possess the following characteristics – agreeableness, empathy, listening comprehension, and sociability – in order to perform well as a law enforcement officer. Satisfactorily determined if any of these characteristics were present when Officer Wilson encountered Michael Brown.

 

Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support your response.

 

Thoroughly argued for or against the theory that a well prepared officer should possess the following characteristics – agreeableness, empathy, listening comprehension, and sociability – in order to perform well as a law enforcement officer. Thoroughly determined if any of these characteristics were present when Officer Wilson encountered Michael Brown.

Thoroughly provided a rationale to support your response.

 

4. Given the circumstances surrounding this event, consider the following options the officer in question may have had in this case.

Select the option that you believe would have best served the purpose of protecting the officer, the suspect, and the general public in this case. Provide a rationale for your response.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely considered the options the officer in question may have had in this case. Did not submit or incompletely selected the option that you believe would have best served the purpose of protecting the officer, the suspect, and the general public in this case. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

 

Insufficiently considered the options the officer in question may have had in this case. Insufficiently selected the option that you believe would have best served the purpose of protecting the officer, the suspect, and the general public in this case.

Insufficiently provided a rationale for your response.

 

Partially considered the options the officer in question may have had in this case. Partially selected the option that you believe would have best served the purpose of protecting the officer, the suspect, and the general public in this case. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

 

 

Satisfactorily considered the options the officer in question may have had in this case. Satisfactorily selected the option that you believe would have best served the purpose of protecting the officer, the suspect, and the general public in this case. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

 

 

Thoroughly considered the options the officer in question may have had in this case. Thoroughly selected the option that you believe would have best served the purpose of protecting the officer, the suspect, and the general public in this case. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

 

5. Support your views with at least three (3) relevant and credible references, documented according to APA.

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code LOCKDOWN